Editor’s note: The following opinions were gathered around Jack-sonville Friday. These do not represent the entire Jacksonville electorate, nor were any scientific methods used in gathering these opinions.
A group of Jacksonville residents reacted to the possibility a referendum allowing the sales of alcohol for off-premises consumption could appear on an upcoming city election ballot.
A committee has been formed to explore the possibility of getting just such an item to the public for a vote next year.
Sandra Jones
Position: Against
Reason: “It’s because of the end result. It doesn’t take into account the wrecks it causes and the police trouble. It’s a moral issue.”
William Cooper
Position: For
Reason: “We’re losing all the tax money to the next county over. People want it; they’re going to get it.”
Teresa Munoz
Position: For
Reason: “I’m okay with it. It’s going to help Jacksonville by selling alcohol here. It’s not so far to drive.”
Fannie Franklin
Position: Either way
Reason: “I believe it’s the people’s choice. It’s safer to buy in town than to buy out.”
Bernie Hutson
Position: Against
Reason: “It’s not going to help the community at all. The only ones who are going to make any money are the ones selling it.”
Christina Aguiler
Position: For
Reason: “It’s the same thing. People are already drinking. They’re driving back and forth to get it.”
Dave Black
Position: For
Reason: “I would like to see people keep money here. Why go all the way to Rusk or Cuney?”
Lewis Silmon
Position: Against
Reason: “I can’t see a benefit from it. If you make it available, it’s too easy to get. You could see younger children having a problem.”
Erbil Stover
Position: Against
Reason: “I go to church and I don’t believe in it. I see too many homes broken up.”
Opal Lewis
Position: Neutral
Reason: “It will help the economy, but I don’t want to see any deaths.”
